• New Index
  • About
  • Blog
Menu

Richard Holledge

  • New Index
  • About
  • Blog
Petrol station queen

Petrol station queen

Experiment in Leningrad

December 17, 2019
The Scarlet Flower

The Scarlet Flower


In the late 1950s, the Soviet Union had a spring in its collectivised step. Censorship had softened; premier Nikita Krushchev had encouraged a scintilla of freedom by permitting cultural exchanges with the west. In 1961, Yuri Gagarin created a galvanising upsurge in national pride by becoming the first man to reach space.

Into this relatively tractable atmosphere stepped the London gallerist Eric Estorick, an avid collector of modern Italian art, who was hoping to reconnect with the culture his Jewish parents had left behind in 1905 when they emigrated to the US. Visiting Leningrad (now St Petersburg) in 1960, he met the artist Anatoli Kaplan, who introduced him to a group of talented friends known as the Leningrad Experimental Graphics Laboratory (LEGL), the graphics section of the state-run Union of Artists. 

So impressed was Estorick that he bought hundreds of their works — some for as little as nine roubles each — and staged an exhibition in May 1961 of paintings by 27 of them in his new Grosvenor Gallery back home. For the first time since the Russian Revolution, western art lovers were able to see contemporary art from the USSR — and, perhaps more telling, discover works that defied the glum stereotype of Socialist Realism. Instead, the art historian Nikolai Kononikhin has written, “they found an unexpected vitality and humanity free from ideological cliché”. 

Lithography from Leningrad, currently at London’s Estorick Collection, is a small but perfectly focused display of works by 15 of the artists who featured in the original show — the first time they have been exhibited together in the UK since the 1960s. The catalogue gives a wider insight into their work, with many more examples of paintings by the artists who strove together, elbow to elbow, in a scruffy basement cluttered with easels, presses and the stones used for printing. It was, wrote the Leningrad poet Lev Mochalov, “an island of the blessed”. (A comprehensive exhibition of their work will be held in St Petersburg next November.)

Kaplan already had a reputation for designing posters and illustrating books. His work is characterised by his atmospheric black-and-white lithographs of Jewish life. Here, we see “Summer Garden”, a poetic, rather wistful scene of a boy pulling another on a sled beside railings and a foreboding urn-shaped tomb. Estorick snapped Kaplan up for a solo show later in 1961, which was so successful that The Burlington Magazine was moved to declare: “They are so brilliantly good that in comparison Chagall seems like a sloppy amateur.”

If Kaplan was the best known of the collective, Boris Ermolaev was the father figure — “like a holy elder”, declared fellow artist Valentin Kurdov — to whom many turned for help and encouragement. Like Kaplan, Ermolaev stayed true to his roots throughout his career, rarely deviating from charming, stylised scenes of peasant life represented in simple primary colours — images of a stone mason, women doing embroidery or resting from their labours during the harvest. They capture a Russian world that was disappearing even then. 

As the 1960s progressed and the effects of the second world war and the Stalin era diminished, awareness of the outside world within Russia grew — particularly in the arts scene. Books and journals slipped past the censors containing revelations of European movements such as Post-Impressionism and Expressionism, which brought a dose of modernism into the folk art traditions the Laboratory embraced. 

Among the most significant influences were Matisse and his contemporary the French Fauvist-cum-Naturalist Albert Marquet, as the vivacious still lifes of Aleksandr Vedernikov and Mikhail Sculyari testify. In the words of Aleksandra Yakobson, the ferment of creativity in the Leningrad basement amounted to “a hotbed of free thinking”. 

Yakobson herself produced a series of engaging images, such as the child we see in “The Scarlet Flower”, pink-cheeked and artless, about to inhale the perfume of the blossom. She also portrayed cheery family groups, a drunken musician being bundled home and a nude emerging from the bath looking clean and wholesome. 

The work of Vera Matyukh, one of many women who were part of the collective, is altogether bolder both in subject and style. Her images depict women in urban settings and as independent as she was, such as the spirited “Petrol Station Queen” or the magenta-lipped “Mother”. 

Having survived the blockade of Leningrad with a newborn baby in her arms, Matyukh was evacuated to Kazan in south-west Russia before moving back to Leningrad at the end of the war, where she joined the LEGL. “I remember it all with joy,” she wrote. “Besides art, which was the most important, there was a lot of joyfulness, dancing, skiing trips and excursions. All this was part of the life.”

Given state strictures, Soviet artists were required to take inspiration from their own heritage and immediate surroundings. Yet one artist, Gerta Nemenova, was allowed to study art in Paris where she had classes with Fernand Léger and met the pioneering avant-garde artist Natalia Goncharova, who had moved there from Russia before the 1917 Revolution. Nemenova developed a style that was quite different from the others; her sketches of writers and actors, mostly in black and white, are done with expressive and deceptively simple strokes, which captured her subjects with a forceful immediacy.

Only one artist featured here, Grigor Israilevich, rocked the political boat. His sinister image“Owl and Hourglass” is part of a series about time slipping away, but he also painted a fierce monochrome series entitled “Rhinoceros”, inspired by the Romanian-French playwright Eugène Ionesco’s 1959 satire on fascism and mob mentality. 

Israilevich, who died in 1999, was also the only one who ventured into abstract art, with angry, expressionist works attacking the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.The Union of Artists was finally disbanded in 1992, the year after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the LEGL was closed. By then, most of the group had died or moved on. The island of the blessed was no more.

Lithography from Leningrad: Eric Estorick’s Adventure in Soviet Art is at the Estorick Collection, London, until December 22

litho 3.jpg
← That was LifeThe curious world of George Stubbs, horse whisperer →

 FIVE GREAT NEW HISTORICAL BOOKS 

New European, May 28, 2020

ne review 2.jpeg

Voices of the Mayflower by Richard Holledge 

July marks the 400 years since a motley bunch of people sailed across the Atlantic to the New World on a surprisingly small tub called the Mayflower. Among the many books and programmes commemorating the anniversary few will have the human insight of this, in which Holledge brings the voyage to life with an account that is not quite fact but not completely fiction either. As ever the best history is told though individual stories and Holledge’s imagined voices speak to us eloquently down the centuries.’

 

The Scattered; a saga of suffering and survival

Love lost; love regained. Freedom; oppression. The casual cruelty of great nations; the plight of the weak and dispossessed. And against all hope—survival and a new life.

The Scattered dramatizes the incredible life of one man and the people he loved, caught up in the saga that befell the Acadians, a simple, peaceable people, who were expelled by the British from their homes in Nova Scotia, Canada, in 1755. The great powers—France and Britain—were caught up in a titanic battle for power in North America. The small enclave of French-speaking Acadians were in the way and were brushed aside.

To find out more, please go to The Scattered at Amazon

 

 

Here's a book for anyone who endured - or enjoyed -working in British national newspapers over the past 30-plus years. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/arnie-wilson/reverse-ferret-a-fleet-st_b_9538290.html

 

Aah, takes me back … to the days of four-day weeks, long liquid lunches, typewriters, spikes and sub-editors. Before desks became workstations, shorthand gave way to Dictaphones and then iPhones, and when every good reporter had his own Deep Throat inside the police force.

It probably takes a Fleet Street veteran to identify the inspiration for the title of this novel. Like me, anyone who was there in the 1980s might think they can identify some of the real-life journalists thinly-disguised as characters in this gloriously funny and racy romp - even though their names have been stolen or adapted from locations in Manchester - Hazel Grove, Miles Platting, Clough Boggart for a start.

But I was brought to a full stop (or should I say ‘point, new par’?) when I realised I was present at an event which becomes quite central to the plot. It was one of those ‘think tanks’ - or drink tanks - that used to be a popular excuse to combine a weekend in a luxury hotel, often with its own golf course, with a brief spell of brainstorming. I think I may even have had a hand in organising this one, at Hever Castle, one-time home of Anne Boleyn.

It was at that moment I realised that the W.M.Boot credited as the author was not only someone familiar with the inner workings of long-lost Fleet Street AND Evelyn Waugh’s ‘Scoop’ but also someone I had worked alongside. It took me a while but I eventually figured out who he (or she) is, and I am sworn to secrecy. Although anyone familiar with Humbert Wolfe’s view of British journalists will know that it might not take too much persuasion to get me to reveal all.

Regardless of my own involvement in the story, and my acquaintance with the author and his characters, this is a thoroughly enjoyable read and a realistic insight behind the scenes of tabloid newspapers before they were eviscerated by a combination of Leveson and the internet. When journalists were more interested in tippling than tweeting, and for whom sex was more important than selfies.

It was published just over a year ago and I can’t believe it has not been reviewed by Press Gazette or on the media pages of The Guardian. It deserves a wider audience - beyond those who can say ‘I was there.”

*********

This is an hilarious book on the excesses of Fleet Street. I thought the phone hacking scandal was bad enough but this is an often rumbustious dive into murky waters or crime, venality, huge egos and lots of sex. Racism, sexism, alcoholism - it’s all here.

But it is more than just a kiss and tell. It is something of a morality tale in which the hero fulfils his ambition - but at a terrible price. I really enjoyed the uncomfortable mix of satire and seriousness.

******

Jonathan

5.0 out of 5 stars

Putting the Boot into Fleet Street

Enjoyed this review by fellow hack Arnie Wilson, spotted on Huffington Post (see above)

"Reverse Ferret is a book about Fleet Street. And the suspicious, somewhat sexually explicit death – was it murder? – of the editor of the mythical “Sunday Chronicle”.

Not just any book about London’s famous (former) national newspaper HQ but one of the best – racy, intelligent, witty, slick, and so tightly crafted that it almost needs oxygen in order to breathe. What a shame that most readers aged - shall we say under 40 – might understand the naughty bits but won’t really understand the best bits (although these are sometimes one and the same). Nor will they really register the news events or even the TV programmes of the age – the Falklands War, for example. Or Dirty Den. Or even the Page 3 girl “Luscious Lovely Linda Lusardi”.

Fleet Street and its reporters’ modus operandi (long alcoholic lunches, typewriters, and the chance to actually get out of the office and meet real people instead of so often relying these days on sandwiches at your desk, email press releases and interviews) is no more.

Reverse ferret is a phrase “used predominantly within the British media to describe a sudden reversal in an organisation's editorial line on a certain issue - and generally, this will involve no acknowledgement of the previous position”. The term apparently originates from Kelvin MacKenzie's time at The “soaraway” Sun – sometimes known as the “current bun”. And if ever the swashbuckling nature of Fleet Street of the 1980s could ever be captured in a single real-life character it was MacKenzie!

W.M. Boot is not, of course, the author’s real name. (And is not related to William Boot, the fictional journalist in the 1938 Evelyn Waugh comic novel Scoop). But I know who he or she is - a chum who gave me my first ever taste of Fleet Street in the ‘70s. Thanks Boot. I won’t put the boot in my naming you since some of the characters in Reverse Ferret are known to both of us and might be unhappy with their portrayal! Suffice it to say that Boot was an executive on several national newspapers - the Daily and Sunday Mirror, The European, Today, the late lamented Independent and the Times. Among others. And I know of one “other” in particular, but I won’t give the game away.

What does amaze me is the obviously superior classical education that Boot was able to conceal from us when working on some of our saucier stories. Where DID Boot learn that vast academic knowledge? Not in Fleet Street that’s for sure!

Boot certainly bears no resemblance to Miles Platting, a character in the book “whose career as a showbiz writer had spiralled into drunken oblivion after his wife had left him for a young reporter she met at a Chronicle office party.

“He missed deadlines, failed to turn up at interviews, and when he did, invariably had a row with the star. As Tarquin (another character in the book) put it: ‘The Man The Stars Talk To became The Hack The Stars Do Their Best To Run A Mile From’.

One of the funniest characters in Reverse Ferret is a slimy and corrupt policeman, Inspector Dennis Droyle who “had the disconcerting habit of adding an aitch at the most unpredictable moments in what was presumably an attempt to shun the ‘ello ‘ello stereotype of the TV copper, but any attempt at gravity was vitiated by his voice, a high-pitched, adenoidal whine”.

Example: “Hi must say – I rather thought you National newspaper journalists would be living in a more hopulent suite of offices than this.”

But Boot writes: “Hopulent they were not. The features staff were packed together as tightly as a traffic jam on the new M25. There were seven of them in theory, sharing a hugger mugger of desks, bedecked with dirty mugs that nurtured vivid biospecimens , pots of glue and chewed Biros, hemmed in by overflowing waste bins (and), stacks of newspapers”.

Sooner or later, of course, on-screen technology would seep like a virus into all newspaper offices including the “Chronic”. There was a “charge against change” from the staff who “wanted to stay working as they always had, tapping at their typewriters, using paper, ballpoints, scissors and glue. They relished the familiarity of the office, with its smell of damp page proofs, the background clatter of the Linotype machines, the rumble of the presses. If it was good enough for Caxton, it was good enough for them.”

Sadly (perhaps) it was not to be. But with hindsight, Fleet Street was always good fun. Thanks, Boot, for reminding us. And that “heditor” who died? Was it murder? You’ll have to read the book to henlighten yourselves!

– Arnie Wilson

*******

Subs desk

A book that takes you back to the Valpolicella-fuelled newsrooms of the 1980s. Deftly-plotted and highly entertaining with a cast of characters that will be familiar to those who were around at the time.

 

 

Who listens?

Who hears? 

The Acadian tragedy

260 years on

 

My old friend Arnie Wilson had this to say in his Huffington Post blog: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/arnie-wilson/the-scattered-by-richard-holledge_b_7878142.html

Powered by Squarespace